<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Animystic &#187; mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.animystic.org.uk/tag/mathematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.animystic.org.uk</link>
	<description>exploring a living world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Animism: Souls or Relationships?</title>
		<link>http://www.animystic.org.uk/2009/09/18/animism-souls-or-relationships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.animystic.org.uk/2009/09/18/animism-souls-or-relationships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[animism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.animystic.org.uk/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent discussion on the Druid Network lead me to ask the question: Do you see animism as implying that that which is animated is so by virtue of an animating force, a spirit or a soul. Or do you, like me, understand being alive as a property of relationship within a set of systems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-126" title="strangeattractor" src="http://www.animystic.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/strangeattractor-300x225.jpg" alt="strangeattractor" width="300" height="225" />A recent discussion on the Druid Network lead me to ask the question: Do you see animism as implying that that which is animated is so by virtue of an animating force, a spirit or a soul. Or do you, like me, understand being alive as a property of relationship within a set of systems within systems, where life is a given manifestation of the behaviour of the totality of all that is? Or do you see it is something else entirely.</p>
<p>A blog post by Lance Foster at <a href="http://hengruh.livejournal.com/65154.html" target="_blank">The Sleeping Giant</a> also had me asking similar things of myself. I have used terms like soul and spirit&#8230; enspirited&#8230; to describe the being alive that I mean when I refer to animism, but the words are not adequate unless used maybe as poetic metaphor.</p>
<p>I realise that I *fully* identify being alive with *relationship*. And as no thing can not NOT be in relationship, so all things are alive.</p>
<p>What we are changes. Day by day, minute by minute, second by every miniscule fraction of a second. We metamorphise constantly, both by virtue of constant change in relationship both internally and externally and by virtue of agreement&#8230; consensus within some of those relationships as to what constitutes an entity and thus, a person.</p>
<blockquote><p>A set is a Many that allows itself to be thought of as a One.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><em>Georg Cantor, quoted in &#8220;Infinity and the Mind&#8221; by Rudy Rucker.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>And each of the elements of a set of elements is also interacting with and in relationship to all other elements, at every level of existence. The interaction is the living itself&#8230; is consciousness itself&#8230; and we descend into Indra&#8217;s net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.animystic.org.uk/2009/09/18/animism-souls-or-relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
